Does the Apple Watch Series 10 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 include an Oxygen Sensor?

Truthfully, the blood oxygen feature is mostly irrelevant. Why? If you have a condition that requires monitoring, Apple Watch is not FDA approved. You can buy an FDA approved model, and carry it in your pocket or purse, for under $20 on Amazon. If you don’t have a condition that requires monitoring, it’s just a convenience (gimmick?) and shouldn’t really affect your purchasing decision. If it has the sensor, it could in theory, be enable by Apple a time far in the future.

This explains. It applies to all the newly announced Apple Watches.

About Blood Oxygen availability - Apple Support

just disabled, it would be a huge production cost inc for apple to produce 2 models in parallel 1 for USA and one for the rest of the world only because of a maybe temp legal ban in the USA

Here’s the real answer. From the horse’s mouth. Sensor is there. Software disabled due to IP court decision. Apple is appealing. All about $.

No info re FDA because nobody cares. Regular people use their common sense. I have a low SpO2 condition, and watch does what it is supposed to do. Monitor it to highlight any drifts in data. 1-3% here or there is in the noise. Same for any retail version. I doubt a $20 Chinese product is better or more accurate. FDA approval is also all about $. Believe me, if you’re below 90% you don’t need a watch to tell you. You’ll feel like a fish out of water.

About Blood Oxygen availability - Apple Support

answer also provided above by Sherman, but only 4 upvotes. I don’t get it.

Unknown, as the Apple Watch has not shipped yet.

From a manufacturing perspective, it would be easier to include the sensor, and disable it in software for the U.S. market.

Also including the sensor would allow Apple to enable it sometime in the future should the lawyers ever resolve the patent issues (do not hold your breath).

However, just be cause Apple got away with using a software fix for the Series 9, and Ultra II, does not mean the courts will allow it for the Series 10. We can only hope, against some future resolution to the patent issues.

Zachyy wrote:

All Apple Watch units sold by Apple in the United States starting January 18, 2024 will not have the Blood Oxygen measure feature.

The question was not about the feature. It was about the sensor - the capability to implement the feature.

John22 wrote:

Thanks for all of the comments. I called Apple sales today and spoke to a human. She indicated that the new Series 10 will have the sensor but that the feature will be disabled for now. Same for the Ultra 2.

Thanks for posting back with the results of your research!

I sort of understand why people care about the O2 sensor. It's an "I want all the cool features!" feeling. I know I had a bit of a twinge when I hit the button on the trade-in of my 7 for the 10. But I got over it.

I'm looking forward to both the sleep apnea and the hearing aid features, having reached that stage in life where they are potential issues. But should they not happen or not happen for months, I'll get over that, too.

I cannot speak for Apple. But it certainly seems to me that the newly announced Apple Watches would have no less sensor capability than the Apple Watch 9, which certainly contains the required hardware.

John22 wrote:

Thanks for all of the comments. I called Apple sales today and spoke to a human. She indicated that the new Series 10 will have the sensor but that the feature will be disabled for now. Same for the Ultra 2.

Great information, hopefully Apple can settle the dispute with Masimo. I was going to buy the new Ultra 2, and would love to have the feature back.

I have a blood pressure cuff and scale that syncs. I’m perfectly happy using third party devices. I found it interesting the Apple is seeking FDA approval with several new health features. Sleep apnea and hearing loss are much more serious and affect far more users than needing an oximeter. Not meaning to minimize it not being available, just thinking about how various features can affect and change lives.

Glad it’s all resolved.

Zachyy, no problem - I’ve certainly misread my share of questions in these Communities.

Just FYI, I have an Apple Watch 9 purchased before the Blood Oxygen feature was removed. So I have the feature, but don’t use it too regularly (although I do use some of the other health features regularly). I agree with Jeff Donald’s statement that the sleep apnea and hearing loss capabilities seem much more important.

RazorV wrote:

I live at 9,000’ and Blood OX is very important to monitor. Hence Garmin watches monitor it very extensively!

One wonders how folks survived at this altitude before watches were capable of monitoring blood oxygen. Perhaps they all wore finger clip pulse oximeters.

Enjoy your Garmin watch.

I disagree as well. I have the Watch 7, which still has the oxygen sensor, and have found it to be quite accurate and useful during workouts. I have lung issues so monitoring my oxygen levels is important to me, especially during exercise, and I would rather use the watch than another device. I would love to upgrade my watch but will wait to do so until Apple resolves the patent issues related to this feature.